A comprehensive analysis of the journal evaluation system in China

Forfattere: Ying Huang; Ruinan Li; Lin Zhang; Gunnar Sivertsen.

Tidsskrift: Quantitative Science Studies.

Abstract:
Journal evaluation systems reflect how new insights are critically reviewed and published, and the prestige and impact of a discipline’s journals is a key metric in many research assessments, performance evaluation, and funding systems. With the expansion of China’s research and innovation systems and its rise as a major contributor to global innovation, journal evaluation has become an especially important issue. In this paper, we first describe the history and background of journal evaluation in China and then systematically introduce and compare the most currently influential journal lists and indexing services. These are: the Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD), the Journal Partition Table (JPT), the AMI Comprehensive Evaluation Report (AMI), the Chinese S&T Journal Citation Report (CJCR), “A Guide to the Core Journals of China” (GCJC), the Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index (CSSCI), and the World Academic Journal Clout Index (WAJCI). Some other influential lists produced by government agencies, professional associations, and universities are also briefly introduced. Through the lens of these systems, we provide: comprehensive coverage of the tradition and landscape of the journal evaluation system in China and the methods and practices of journal evaluation in China with some comparisons to how other countries assess and rank journals.

detaljer

Tittel A comprehensive analysis of the journal evaluation system in China
KategoriARTIKKEL
Ying Huang
ForfatterRuinan Li
Lin Zhang
ForfatterGunnar Sivertsen
publikasjonsår2020
issn2641-3337